I turned out to be Lawful-Good. Booooorign! Superman. I want to be Batman. What's Batman?

I'm thinking he's pretty dang Chaotic Good. It's a weird example, because he totally reveres the law, and wants a lawful society, but his entire schtick is goind around and breaking those laws.

True, he goes around catching bad guys the way he wants, but he does turn them over to the law and doesn't kill anyone. :/

Hmmm. This place has Batman as a True Neutral. I don't agree. If he was, he wouldn't be fighting crime.

Absolutely, I totally agreed. It even describes True Neutral as someone who would fight for the underdog. That means if crime was low, batman would be fighting the police! While batman might have his own reason for doing things, he uses the theory "with great power comes great responsibility", and actively chooses to use his power for the greater good. That makes him a Neutral-Good character. Actually most superheroes (bar Superman) would be Neutral-Good. Superman would be Lawful-Good, because early depictions of Superman had him fighting in wars for America, which is a lawful concept.

Now, another interesting note, I scored as Chaotic-Neutral (as no suprise to me) which puts me up there with wild animals and Tarzan, alongside with Tyler Durton. But in the description it says, "...does not intentionally disrupt organizations as part of a campaign for anarchy." because otherwise you'd have to be motivated (good/evil concept). Umm, didn't Tyler Durton blow up all the major credit card companies across America? But in his defense, a Chaotic Neutral person could actually do such a thing if they threatened his lifestyle (of chaos and anarchy). However, Tyler Durton is a very complex character. I actually believe at the beginning he was a Chaotic-Neutral, then became Lawful-Neutral near the end when chaos became the law he governed. NOTE: (Chaotic individuals do not make good leaders).

In Gotham City, the cops *are* the underdogs.

The cops would have to become totalitarian fascists to change that on their own, and then Batman *would* try to take them down.

You know, just to play devil's advocate.

Drat - I was really looking forward to taking this survey -- and I'm still gonna -- but now I'm fairly convinced the author is not qualified to have written it.

I'm with Paul on the "odd case but clearly chaotic good" tip.

Well, according to you, I'm neutral good, but according to this test, I'm...

Chaotic-Good
92% Good, 68% Chaotic

25. You stand to testify in against your (guilty) close friend. Your feelings/actions are...

Guilty of what?? Some crimes have victims, others don't. I cannot answer the question as it stands. No I do not testify against my close friend the pot dealer; yes I testify against my close friend the wife beater. Damn it. Help me out.

i agree. the boss wants you to kill 20 people? what kind of people? some guy who took too long at the checkout line? Pol Pot?

Now that one, it specifically states that you don't know. If you do it, you're evil, says I. I take the money, quit, call the police and disappear.

Ha! You're right, it does. My bad.

I wound up deciding my friend was a wife-beater so I could get on with it.

Well, yeah, but there's lots of fun in picking it apart!

"OMG I can't believe he has Bataman as Tru Neu! WTF?!?"

:D

Yeah, but this GAME is a classic, and our arguments are over 40 years old. My point is, he should have gotten it by now! Plus, it's obvious he has a biased opinion about a lot of things (read his note in the true neutral description).

oh, and btw, we ARE in fact having LOADS of fun with this test (at the creator's expense) ;)

Chaotic-Neutral 44% Good, 66% Chaotic

Plane of Existence: Limbo, "Plane of Ever-Changing Chaos". Description: An alien, anarchistic and unpredictable plane. Notable Inhabitants: Githzerai - human-like monks; Slaad - frog-like creatures. Examples of Chaotic-Neutrals (Ethically Chaotic, Morally Neutral) Tyler Durden Dr. Frankenstein Doctor Moreau Tarzan Peeves the Poltergeist Fred & George Weasly "Wild animals" The almost totally unpredictable non-conformist loner. Will stand by and watch the white knight battle the black knight without feeling compelled to take sides. Will keep their word if in their best interest May attack an unarmed foe May use poison May help those in need Prefers to work alone Responds poorly to higher authority Distrustful of organizations Self preservation is strong but will not go to the same extent as Neutral-Evils. They can generally be swayed easily. Chaotic Neutral "Free Spirit" A chaotic neutral [person] follows his whims. He is an individualist first and last. He values his own liberty but doesn't strive to protect others' freedom. He avoids authority, resents restrictions, and challenges traditions. A chaotic neutral [person] does not intentionally disrupt organizations as part of a campaign of anarchy. To do so, he would have to be motivated either by good (and a desire to liberate others), evil (and a desire to make others suffer), or be lawful neutral. A chaotic neutral [person] may be unpredictable, but his behavior is not totally random. He is not as likely to jump off a bridge as to cross it. Chaotic neutral is freedom from both society's restrictions and a do-gooder's zeal. Chaotic-Good

</td><td bgcolor="white" width="18"></td>

<tr><td></td></tr></table>