October 3rd, 2010


well, yes

"The Globe is really, really angry that some activist judge subverted the rightful duty of Parliament who were going to get to overturning dangerously irresponsible prostitution laws any day now. Of course, the Globe is just rehashing the same argument that's been used to condemn every civil rights decision that's ever been made, which of course misses the entire point of civil rights jurisprudence because the rights of the minority shouldn't be determined by the whims of the majority even when the former are prostitutes."