? ?
23 September 2008 @ 01:48 pm
yes, I am avoiding the internet to avoid Heroes spoilers  
Nice. Obama wins an endorsement by the former publisher of National Review. Interesting reasoning, also.

"Archaeologists have pinpointed the construction of Stonehenge to 2300BC."

Um, there's no problem in talking to the press as long as you know what you're talking about.

* "Without changing deployment patterns, without changing length of tours, we do not have the forces to send three additional brigade combat teams to Afghanistan at this point." -Defense Secretary Gates
* How the financial bailout will shape the next presidency. And more on how that nasty reality is just screwing up the campaigns' plans. (Good read.)
* Bad news from the Niger delta.
* Conservatives look for new ways to win over young people on college campuses.
* At the World Trade Center site, a look back to the ice age.
* OK, look. If having a new Japanese prime minister who is a manga fan doesn't get us giant robots, nothing will.
* Cartoon Networks sacks Toonami.

MORE LASERS PLEASE. If I can't have a flying car, I at least want a frikkin' laser gun.

Still going. A bold new mission for the Mars rover Opportunity.

MsCongenialitymscongeniality on September 23rd, 2008 06:37 pm (UTC)
The revised carbon dates, I'm perfectly fine with. It's their assumptions about site usage that makes me want to smack them.
PMMJ: Science!cheetahmaster on September 23rd, 2008 07:34 pm (UTC)
Re: Stonehenge
Well, sure.

We'll see how the final verdict pans out.